When I speculated one month ago that the current armourstone toe of the valley slope on the east side of the Humber river (not far from my home) was going to be replaced with a higher version, I wasn't entirely correct. It may end up being higher but (more importantly) it will also be further into the river.
Roy Murray continues his Raymore Park updates on the construction (March 30, April 12, April 18, and a follow-up). In the last of these he lets on that the retaining wall will end up on top of the now-in-the-river foundation! This is actually good news for my side of the river because it means that I might be able to access this new stretch of real estate from the south (behind Denison Park) and walk it up to the footbridge (across the river) that lies beyond. Of course Roy worries that the now-narrower river channel will negatively impact his side of the river during flood events. Here's a bird's-eye Apple Maps view of the area (I've put a red square around my house):
Thursday, April 21, 2016
Saturday, April 09, 2016
8613, ...
In numbers of the form 2^n-2^m-1, m<n-1, for what values of n is the sum of the values of m for which that number is prime equal to n?
Tuesday, April 05, 2016
She said, he said
On page 20 of the 23 November 1939 Cleveland Plain Dealer is a Good Morning from Claire MacMurray column called "Thanksgiving Nightmare" which tells the tale of a "Mrs. Amos Pinchot" writing a bit of verse whilst in a dream state:
Hogamus Higamus
Men are Polygamous
Higamus Hogamus
Women Monogamous
The men/women being polygamous/monogamous was certainly nothing new. A Google Books search finds references going back into the 1800s. What was new are the two words hogamus and higamus. Who coined them?
The Reader's Digest reprinted the poem and its origin in its May 1940 issue, giving the nonsense words wide circulation. Any attribution to folk after this date is therefore moot. No one appears to have come out of the woodwork to say: Hey, that's my misappropriated poetry! But we do have something else — someone suggesting that Claire MacMurray lied about the poem's authorship.
In 1942 James Grier Miller published a book called "Unconsciousness" in which he retells the story of the writing of the verse — but from the perspective of a man! The switch was accomplished by means of a footnote stating: "Mrs. Amos Pinchot has repeatedly been incorrectly said to have been the author of this quatrain. She denies any responsibility for it, however, and the true author appears to be shrouded in anonymity." Mr. Miller was certainly no stranger to referencing assertions, so it's somewhat disconcerting to see him not do so here.
There were two women who could have claimed to having been Mrs. Amos Pinchot: Gertrude Minturn (who married Amos in 1900) and Ruth Pickering (who married him in 1919). Gertrude died in May 1939 — six months before Claire MacMurray's story appeared. If Ruth Pickering denied authorship of the poem, when and where?
It strikes me as disingenuous to hold Claire MacMurray to a standard that we do not demand of James Grier Miller. Either of them could have promulgated an untruth. [A third possibility is that Ruth Pickering — in denying authorship — did so. A fourth possibility is that Claire MacMurray was referring to Gertrude Minturn.] Yet James Miller's unsupported claim somehow demeans that of Claire MacMurray to an extent that Garson O'Toole calls her story "fanciful". No matter. In the realm of word/phrase origins, early citation is everything. If one is at all uneasy about crediting Mrs. Amos Pinchot for the creation of those fanciful words, attribute them instead to Claire MacMurray*!
* "Claire MacMurray" was her pen name. She was born Bessie Claire McMurray on 12 Feb 1899 in Huntington IN. In 1916 she swam from Liverpool to Havana (Illinois) in under four hours. Marrying Edward Howard II in 1923, they had three sons (born 1925, 1927, and 1929). Claire saw publication of her starting-in-1936 newspaper columns as two books (1941, 1944, subsequently amalgamated into a third). The first of those books inspired the 1941 NBC radio series "We're Five in the Family". Claire died 31 Jul 2003 in Cleveland OH.
Hogamus Higamus
Men are Polygamous
Higamus Hogamus
Women Monogamous
The men/women being polygamous/monogamous was certainly nothing new. A Google Books search finds references going back into the 1800s. What was new are the two words hogamus and higamus. Who coined them?
The Reader's Digest reprinted the poem and its origin in its May 1940 issue, giving the nonsense words wide circulation. Any attribution to folk after this date is therefore moot. No one appears to have come out of the woodwork to say: Hey, that's my misappropriated poetry! But we do have something else — someone suggesting that Claire MacMurray lied about the poem's authorship.
In 1942 James Grier Miller published a book called "Unconsciousness" in which he retells the story of the writing of the verse — but from the perspective of a man! The switch was accomplished by means of a footnote stating: "Mrs. Amos Pinchot has repeatedly been incorrectly said to have been the author of this quatrain. She denies any responsibility for it, however, and the true author appears to be shrouded in anonymity." Mr. Miller was certainly no stranger to referencing assertions, so it's somewhat disconcerting to see him not do so here.
There were two women who could have claimed to having been Mrs. Amos Pinchot: Gertrude Minturn (who married Amos in 1900) and Ruth Pickering (who married him in 1919). Gertrude died in May 1939 — six months before Claire MacMurray's story appeared. If Ruth Pickering denied authorship of the poem, when and where?
It strikes me as disingenuous to hold Claire MacMurray to a standard that we do not demand of James Grier Miller. Either of them could have promulgated an untruth. [A third possibility is that Ruth Pickering — in denying authorship — did so. A fourth possibility is that Claire MacMurray was referring to Gertrude Minturn.] Yet James Miller's unsupported claim somehow demeans that of Claire MacMurray to an extent that Garson O'Toole calls her story "fanciful". No matter. In the realm of word/phrase origins, early citation is everything. If one is at all uneasy about crediting Mrs. Amos Pinchot for the creation of those fanciful words, attribute them instead to Claire MacMurray*!
* "Claire MacMurray" was her pen name. She was born Bessie Claire McMurray on 12 Feb 1899 in Huntington IN. In 1916 she swam from Liverpool to Havana (Illinois) in under four hours. Marrying Edward Howard II in 1923, they had three sons (born 1925, 1927, and 1929). Claire saw publication of her starting-in-1936 newspaper columns as two books (1941, 1944, subsequently amalgamated into a third). The first of those books inspired the 1941 NBC radio series "We're Five in the Family". Claire died 31 Jul 2003 in Cleveland OH.
Sunday, April 03, 2016
L'Anse aux Meadows to Stormy Point
Here's a dozen distance/direction quotes culled from the online stories:
National Geographic (Mar 31): "hundreds of miles south of"
New York Times (Mar 31): "about 300 miles south of"
Huffington Post (Apr 1): "about 300 miles further south than"
Daily Mail (Apr 1): "400 miles (643km) south west of"
Canada Journal (Apr 1): "300 miles (480km) south of"
Gossip Monthly (Apr 1): "about 600 km south of"
CTV News (Apr 1): "approximately 500 kilometres from"
The Telegram (Apr 1): "almost 500 km south of"
The Register (Apr 1): "300km away from"
Digital Journal (Apr 1): "about 500 kilometres (300 miles) south of"
Canadian Press (Apr 1): "about 600 kilometres from"
The Japan Times (Apr 2): "about 700 kilometers (430 miles) away"
To give credit to Digital Journal's Karen Graham, she added "on the south-west coast". My measurement in Google Earth is 501.13 km at a heading of 214.96°, which corresponds (roughly) to southwest by south (SW by S = 213.75°).
Wikipedia now sports an entry on Point Rosee: "approximately 600 kilometres (370 mi) south of L'Anse aux Meadows". I'm curious how long it will take before it mentions Stormy Point.
National Geographic (Mar 31): "hundreds of miles south of"
New York Times (Mar 31): "about 300 miles south of"
Huffington Post (Apr 1): "about 300 miles further south than"
Daily Mail (Apr 1): "400 miles (643km) south west of"
Canada Journal (Apr 1): "300 miles (480km) south of"
Gossip Monthly (Apr 1): "about 600 km south of"
CTV News (Apr 1): "approximately 500 kilometres from"
The Telegram (Apr 1): "almost 500 km south of"
The Register (Apr 1): "300km away from"
Digital Journal (Apr 1): "about 500 kilometres (300 miles) south of"
Canadian Press (Apr 1): "about 600 kilometres from"
The Japan Times (Apr 2): "about 700 kilometers (430 miles) away"
To give credit to Digital Journal's Karen Graham, she added "on the south-west coast". My measurement in Google Earth is 501.13 km at a heading of 214.96°, which corresponds (roughly) to southwest by south (SW by S = 213.75°).
Wikipedia now sports an entry on Point Rosee: "approximately 600 kilometres (370 mi) south of L'Anse aux Meadows". I'm curious how long it will take before it mentions Stormy Point.
Saturday, April 02, 2016
Stormy Point, Millville NL
When the (possible) new Vikings-settlement story broke on Thursday it was given a dateline location of Point Rosee. This dealt amateur geographers a good measure of grief because Point Rosie (by Rosée Harbour, in Fortune Bay) is (by way of English corruption) actually Point Enragée, on the Burin peninsula — nowhere near the archaeological site.
It took a little time to determine the site's exact location. And having that, I learned that it was actually called Stormy Point. So from whence comes the "Point Rosee"? It could be a local name. However, it's possible — likely even — that the archaeologists decided to disguise the location so as to keep the public at bay.*
I have to say, Stormy Point strikes me as a poor location for a settlement. It's totally open to the elements!
* Addendum: I just finished watching the Nova episode on this. Indeed, early in the program they called the location "secret".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)